More of that zany Biden

[jabtay]

Biden: FDR Got on TV in 1929 And Explained Why the Market Crashed | The American Pundit

A nice catch by a reader of Michelle Malkin’s. During his interview with Katie Couric on CBS News, Joe Biden (AKA Gaffemaster) had this to say:

“When the stock market crashed, Franklin Roosevelt got on the television and didn’t just talk about the princes of greed. He said, ‘look, here’s what happened.’”

Where to start. First of all, Franklin Delano Roosevelt was elected 1932 — the market crashed in 1929. Second of all, Philo Farnsworth created the first working television in 1928. Again, the market crashed in 1929. FDR got on a device nobody had at a time when he wasn’t president? Joe, get a history book. Good Lord.

YouTube - Biden on FDRs management of the 1929...

This guy...hes a laugh a minute.

[YuppyKiller]

Yep, Hoover was president then and Biden's a dumb ass now.

[HullBreach]

Man, if this is who Obama picked to be his veep who is going to be in his cabinet? Christ thats a scary mental picture.

[jabtay]

Its funny how people on this board will call Palin "stupid", yet give this idiot a pass

[adric]

The first presidential address broadcast from the White House was Harry S. Truman's speech about food conservation and the world food crisis on Oct. 5, 1947.

http://www.infoplease.com/askeds/fir...sident-tv.html

Roosevelt was the first on any TV broadcast, but that was at a World's Fair in '39.

[YuppyKiller]

Originally Posted by adric

http://www.infoplease.com/askeds/fir...sident-tv.html

Roosevelt was the first on any TV broadcast, but that was at a World's Fair in '39.

PLEASE tell me you're not trying to justify what this ignorant piece of work said...

[25psi]

Of course you won't hear about this on the drive-by media, but if this where McCain or a McCain affiliate it would be all over the place.


Nothing like making shit up out of thin air to spruce up an interview and get your point across.

[YuppyKiller]

Originally Posted by 25psi

Of course you won't hear about this on the drive-by media, but if this where McCain or a McCain affiliate it would be all over the place.


Nothing like making shit up out of thin air to spruce up an interview and get your point across.

That's right. Obama has these people so wrapped around his finger.. you try to prove that these people are not fit for the job and they call McCain old.. I mean Idk if you've seen McCain but he walks around like 30 yr old man. He has no troubles getting around and he sure doesn't act like he's 73 or however old he is.

The liberal's are in it for the power. That's the only thing they want, more Government, more power for them. Liberal's BENAFIT from the gas prices being so high. Why do you think they're so high anyway?

FACT: 4 months ago a barrel of gas cost 125.00. Gas prices were 4.15/gal.

TODAY: Gas is 94.00 a barrel and gas is 3.95. Why is that?

Why do the liberals want to tax the Big oil companies? Is that their resolution to this whole mess? I don't think so, it's because they want to tax everything. And make it seem like the middle class is going to benafit from it. Well they're not, Obama's failed politics have already been tried in other countries, he's a hack, and his whole career has been a complete sham.

The Obama-media won't tell you about this stuff until it comes time that Hilary agrees to be the Vice President and Biden is forced to say something completely retarded and Obama looks like he had to get rid of Biden because of something Biden said. All so that Obama looks like the innocent one in this race. Obama picked the wrong candidate, he's picked the wrong route to go down. If he wanted to win this election, he should've had more conservative views, but he's too busy taking advice from people who fucked over millions of people to earn a quick buck. The guys a follower, not a leader, and if he gets elected, you will see this country fail like it's never failed before.

Now, back to the topic at hand.

[Political_Man]

Originally Posted by 25psi

Of course you won't hear about this on the drive-by media, but if this where McCain or a McCain affiliate it would be all over the place.


Nothing like making shit up out of thin air to spruce up an interview and get your point across.

I'd like to point out that the whole Spain gaffe wasn't really picked up by the mainstream media. I don't think that McCain really thinks Spain is in South America... I just think he either misunderstood or had a brain fart.

I wouldn't say EXACTLY the same thing about the Biden gaffe, I would say that it's not that big a deal.

I will say the gaffe by Biden is a little funnier because of the arrogance of it. If your are going to make a comment to the effect of "Part of way a leader does is demonstrate that he knows what he's talking about" the next thing out of your mouth HAS GOT TO BE DEAD ON, 100%, NO MISTAKING, BALLS, COMPLETELY AND EASILY CONFIRMED CORRECT. Otherwise you just look like an ass.



#

[Ralph]

That's right. Obama has these people so wrapped around his finger.. you try to prove that these people are not fit for the job and they call McCain old.. I mean Idk if you've seen McCain but he walks around like 30 yr old man. He has no troubles getting around and he sure doesn't act like he's 73 or however old he is.
To me, how McCain walks around doesn't sway me in either direction regardless of his age. Its the number itself that would raise concern if anything. 73 is getting up there in age and not to say that he wouldn't make it another 4 years, but the possibility that he may not make it 4 more years is higher, due to this age. It's a factor we have no control over. Sure one can argue that someone who is 60 is in better condition mentally and physically than a 25 year old. But we aren't comparing a 73 year old Senator to a 25 year old junkie.

The question I am asking myself is, IF something was to happen to John McCain, would I feel comfortable with Sarah Palin running the United States of America.

The liberal's are in it for the power. That's the only thing they want, more Government, more power for them. Liberal's BENAFIT from the gas prices being so high. Why do you think they're so high anyway?

Can you link some sources that verify this please. I am looking, because I don't know the facts. I've always thought that because of demand around the global economy, the weakening of the US dollar and the current administration had something to do with gas prices being so high.

FACT: 4 months ago a barrel of gas cost 125.00. Gas prices were 4.15/gal.

TODAY: Gas is 94.00 a barrel and gas is 3.95. Why is that?

Why do the liberals want to tax the Big oil companies? Is that their resolution to this whole mess? I don't think so, it's because they want to tax everything. And make it seem like the middle class is going to benafit from it. Well they're not, Obama's failed politics have already been tried in other countries,

Again, can you you point out some references to these statements. From my understanding you are simply stating that because it didn't work in "X" country, it can't possibly work in the US? And can you point out what these failed politics he's using/proposing are that would fail so miserably if elected in November?

he's a hack, and his whole career has been a complete sham.

Can you elaborate a bit more on this, maybe links to some facts?

The Obama-media won't tell you about this stuff until it comes time that Hilary agrees to be the Vice President and Biden is forced to say something completely retarded and Obama looks like he had to get rid of Biden because of something Biden said. All so that Obama looks like the innocent one in this race. Obama picked the wrong candidate, he's picked the wrong route to go down.

Part of this I can agree with you on. If Senator Obama would of picked Clinton to be his VP, I think almost everyone on both sides would agree his election would be a lock. However, he didn't. But out of the possibly choices McCain had, why did he pick Sarah Palin over the others? Was it the best possible choice he had for the United States or was it the best choice he had to possibly win the election? Obama picking Clinton would be the better choice to win the election, if thats all he wants to do. Would Clinton be the better choice as a VP then Joe Biden...I have no idea honestly. I don't know Clinton's foreign policy background (which I believe is why Obama picked Biden).

If he wanted to win this election, he should've had more conservative views, but he's too busy taking advice from people who fucked over millions of people to earn a quick buck.

I've read different, but could you link your source?

The guys a follower, not a leader, and if he gets elected, you will see this country fail like it's never failed before.

Everyone is entitled to their opinion. Can you looked at the current administration over the past 8 years and say it's hasn't already failed? John McCain has always promoted himself as "The Maverick". But is he really? Is he really any different than the current administration? Or is he just saying what Obama's been saying as far as change goes? As people are we supposed to believe that because he's throwing the word change around now, we are supposed to believe him? These are questions I haven't quite answered for myself, but if you can't tell, I look at the last 4 or so years and I'm having a very difficult time trying to believe anything is going to change if I vote for McCain. What I will do before making my mind up 100% is see how both canidates do this Friday in their first National Debate. No more teleprompter excuses, no more scripts, no more media bias (hopefully), just one on one live, debating goodness.

[blacksheep-1]

At least we have Gore who, as everybody knows took credit for creating the internet, and Hillary, who was named after sir Edmind Hillary (who climbed Everest) even though he did it AFTER she was born.
There's some facts that I can believe in.

As for Mr. Ralph, my big concern is why are the dems trying to sign over the control of the country to the UN (and George Soros) that's the power grab that I worry about.

[Ralph]

Originally Posted by blacksheep-1

At least we have Gore who, as everybody knows took credit for creating the internet, and Hillary, who was named after sir Edmind Hillary (who climbed Everest) even though he did it AFTER she was born.
There's some facts that I can believe in.

As for Mr. Ralph, my big concern is why are the dems trying to sign over the control of the country to the UN (and George Soros) that's the power grab that I worry about.

I am unfamiliar with who George Soros is and by what method Democrats are using to sign over control. What exactly does that mean or how is it done. So far I've checked out http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/George_Soros to get more info.

[jabtay]

Originally Posted by Ralph

I am unfamiliar with who George Soros is and by what method Democrats are using to sign over control. What exactly does that mean or how is it done. So far I've checked out http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/George_Soros to get more info.

You dont know who Soros is? Wow...he controls the Dems and part of the media. He is their money man, and main mud slinger

[blacksheep-1]

He made 1 billion dollars in 1 day betting on the collapse of the British pound, the economy of which he manipulated.
He's a swell dude, he pretty much funds the entire "move on brigade" of lefty whackos.

[YuppyKiller]

To me, how McCain walks around doesn't sway me in either direction regardless of his age. Its the number itself that would raise concern if anything. 73 is getting up there in age and not to say that he wouldn't make it another 4 years, but the possibility that he may not make it 4 more years is higher, due to this age. It's a factor we have no control over. Sure one can argue that someone who is 60 is in better condition mentally and physically than a 25 year old. But we aren't comparing a 73 year old Senator to a 25 year old junkie.

The question I am asking myself is, IF something was to happen to John McCain, would I feel comfortable with Sarah Palin running the United States of America.

Well if you want my opinion, I would simply ask if Obama were to be (the A word), or to have something happen to him (God forbid) would we really want someone like Joe Biden in office?

Now I haven't even really seen a bad thing about Palin yet. She's not quite as experienced as I'd like her to be, but her views make her look like she's been doing this stuff forever. And she's literally more experienced than Obama is.. so what does that tell you?

She knows what she's talking about and if McCain would get her off of his script and let her loose she could really show the world what she can do, and expose Obama's ethics as well.

Lately Joe Biden has become more of a Joe Burden. He's been showing his intelligence on numerous occasions in the fact that he doesn't know when to shut his mouth. Seriously do we want someone dealing with Kings and Presidents of HUGE nations that we rely on for this economy and country to run smoothly? We've had enough dumb quotes at the current president's expense, do we need an ill-advised president with a mouth popping vice?

The liberal's are in it for the power. That's the only thing they want, more Government, more power for them. Liberal's BENEFIT from the gas prices being so high. Why do you think they're so high anyway?

Can you link some sources that verify this please. I am looking, because I don't know the facts. I've always thought that because of demand around the global economy, the weakening of the US dollar and the current administration had something to do with gas prices being so high.

Well it's simple. I don't know if you've come across this but here is an independent article with some very basic facts about the liberalism in America and the history upon it.

http://www.americanthinker.com/2008/...d_control.html

Now I just want to point out some a few things that are from this article that we should all be noting even if you don't read that article. But I would urge you to read the entire article for more of an explanation to what's given below.

For nearly two hundred years liberals have believed that the government can solve complex economic problems like the provision and fair distribution of goods and services. For two hundred years they have tested that belief and for two hundred years they have failed. How is it possible for human beings to stay fixated on an idea that has proven untenable time after time after time? The reason: control.

There are thousands of examples of failed socialist experiments that demonstrate this point. But the point itself is not historical. It is factual. It is a simple matter of cause and effect.

In the next article there is some examples of failed socialism in other countries.

http://www.fff.org/freedom/1192b.asp

FACT: 4 months ago a barrel of gas cost 125.00. Gas prices were 4.15/gal.

TODAY: Gas is 94.00 a barrel and gas is 3.95. Why is that?

Why do the liberals want to tax the Big oil companies? Is that their resolution to this whole mess? I don't think so, it's because they want to tax everything. And make it seem like the middle class is going to benefit from it. Well they're not, Obama's failed politics have already been tried in other countries,

Again, can you you point out some references to these statements. From my understanding you are simply stating that because it didn't work in "X" country, it can't possibly work in the US? And can you point out what these failed politics he's using/proposing are that would fail so miserably if elected in November?

Well I have been doing research on this and found a couple articles that explain the "power hungriness" of the democrats on Oil and obviously other subjects.

This article explains what is going on right now as of last year.
Of course the article is explaining how they want to go to electric by 2012 (which will not be possible for most) but it gives you an little insight to what happens when socialist democrats control oil.

http://www.cato.org/pub_display.php?pub_id=8778

he's a hack, and his whole career has been a complete sham.

Can you elaborate a bit more on this, maybe links to some facts?

I think the fact that no one can back up what Barack Obama has even done in his career basically states it. I think the fact that people like Tony Rezco got rich off of him says enough. But here's a funny video proving when people are asked what has he done.. it's really nothing.

YouTube - Obama campaign rep STUMPED on...

And if that doesn't tickle your fancy, here is an article that takes out of a book about Obama's life as a community organizer, and states exactly why he did nothing, and how he left a lot of people out of places to live being friends with Tony Rezco.

http://riverdaughter.wordpress.com/2...ity-organizer/

The Obama-media won't tell you about this stuff until it comes time that Hilary agrees to be the Vice President and Biden is forced to say something completely retarded and Obama looks like he had to get rid of Biden because of something Biden said. All so that Obama looks like the innocent one in this race. Obama picked the wrong candidate, he's picked the wrong route to go down.

Part of this I can agree with you on. If Senator Obama would of picked Clinton to be his VP, I think almost everyone on both sides would agree his election would be a lock. However, he didn't. But out of the possibly choices McCain had, why did he pick Sarah Palin over the others? Was it the best possible choice he had for the United States or was it the best choice he had to possibly win the election? Obama picking Clinton would be the better choice to win the election, if thats all he wants to do. Would Clinton be the better choice as a VP then Joe Biden...I have no idea honestly. I don't know Clinton's foreign policy background (which I believe is why Obama picked Biden).

Can't argue too much with that answer.

If he wanted to win this election, he should've had more conservative views, but he's too busy taking advice from people who fucked over millions of people to earn a quick buck.

I've read different, but could you link your source?

Well I believe his ties with Reins and Mudd are proof enough. Don't you think? Someone who takes advice from a "legal" thief, and basically makes huge errors and messes that cost us (the American People) 800 billion dollars to clean up.. wouldn't you call that a very liberal thing to do? Less liberalism, more conservatism, less speeches, more action and he will have my respect, so far he hasn't shown me a damn thing.


I used this one before, but here is a graph of the people who have been receiving money from the Fanny/Freddy corp. Note: Obama has made the most amount in the shortest amount of time, but ranks in just below Sen. Chris Dodd (another piece of garbage) on most taken from these companies.

http://www.opensecrets.org/news/2008...d-freddie.html

Obama's ties with Frank Reins (Made 90 million dollars off fannie mae in 6 yrs.) (Top economic advisor for Obama), show us that not only is Obama a bad judge of character, but then spews his bad judgements to America and has us all confident in his abilities to run this country.

The guys a follower, not a leader, and if he gets elected, you will see this country fail like it's never failed before.

Everyone is entitled to their opinion. Can you looked at the current administration over the past 8 years and say it's hasn't already failed? John McCain has always promoted himself as "The Maverick". But is he really? Is he really any different than the current administration? Or is he just saying what Obama's been saying as far as change goes? As people are we supposed to believe that because he's throwing the word change around now, we are supposed to believe him? These are questions I haven't quite answered for myself, but if you can't tell, I look at the last 4 or so years and I'm having a very difficult time trying to believe anything is going to change if I vote for McCain. What I will do before making my mind up 100% is see how both canidates do this Friday in their first National Debate. No more teleprompter excuses, no more scripts, no more media bias (hopefully), just one on one live, debating goodness.

Seriously man, I don't think that Bush has failed. I think that he's made some mistakes, one by pushing the "red button". But if you think about it, why would any democrat try and say that we've failed? People like Obama and Clinton, these people all got rich during the Bush Era. Bush was in office when Obama made millions of dollars, was he not? If these people can make millions of dollars, there must be something going right.

I think that the dem's have it all wrong. They want us to fail. They seriously want to pull us out of the war and cause another "Vietnam". We don't even support Vietnam Vets hardly. That's why half of them are on the streets begging for your money. Do we really need that label for the Iraq war too? Failure is not an option in war.

The country has not failed, yet. I think that America, like most "Americans", spends way too much money than they can make. I think that both of the parties are to blame for this economic drop. I also know for a fact that only one party has had a huge hand in the collapse of AIG and the Fanny/Freddy co. that is a very big part of the economic drop. That is the democrats. Name me one Republican who has had a hand in this matter please. I named you a few (and have in other threads) off the top of my head of the democrats involved in this collapse above. That is just the tip of the iceberg.

So honestly man, I will un-proudly say that we have not failed, and Bush has not failed us. As a person, Bush should have left the Gene pool years ago, but as a leader, I think he's done a mediocre job.

Sorry so long.

[jabtay]

Originally Posted by YuppyKiller

Sorry so long.

You typed something? I didnt notice

[Zealot]

Originally Posted by YuppyKiller

I think the fact that no one can back up what Barack Obama has even done in his career basically states it. I think the fact that people like Tony Rezco got rich off of him says enough. But here's a funny video proving when people are asked what has he done.. it's really nothing.

YouTube - Obama campaign rep STUMPED on legislative accomplishments

but but but he can bring change.

If only more reporters would ask that question

[thereturnofdark]

A monkey dancing on vaudeville for six pence could do a better job than GW. Why do you think there are so many parodies of him? Because he's a moron.

[Zealot]

Originally Posted by thereturnofdark

A monkey dancing on vaudeville for six pence could do a better job than GW. Why do you think there are so many parodies of him? Because he's a moron.

I'd prefer a dancing monkey over a monkey that just votes "present"

[HullBreach]

Originally Posted by Zealot

I'd prefer a dancing monkey over a monkey that just votes "present"

Nice burn!!